Saudi judge ignores Quranic rights in harsh decision over the ‘Girl of Qatif’
By Khalid Chraibi
Arablife.org, Tuesday, 22 January 2008
In a memorable scene in Ingmar Bergman’s movie Wild Strawberries, Isak, the central character, dreams that he is standing in court, waiting to be sentenced. But he has no clue as to the charges against him. When the judge declares him guilty, he asks, bewildered: “Guilty of what?†The judge replies flatly: “You are guilty of guiltâ€. “Is that serious?†asks Isak. “Unfortunately,†replies the judge.
The verdict in the case of the ‘Girl of Qatif’, as the incident has become known worldwide, is as bewildering to most people as the judge’s verdict was to Isak. How can a young bride of 18 who has been subjected to the harrowing experience of being blackmailed by a former ‘telephone boyfriend’, then gang-raped 14 times in a row by seven unknown assailants, be further brought to trial for the offence of khalwa and condemned to 90 lashes? How does one justify raising the punishment to 200 lashes and 6 months in jail when she appealed the first sentence?
The case had all the necessary ingredients to become an instant cause célèbre, when word of it reached the global news agencies. It received very large coverage in the media, with the verdict being criticized by commentators, politicians and citizens in all walks of life, within the region and in far away countries.
Amnesty International protested against the flogging verdict (which was also applicable to the men involved in the case), observing that “the use of corporal punishment constitutes cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.†It added that “the criminalisation of khalwa is inconsistent with international human rights standards, in particular, an individual’s right to privacy.†The sentence against the ‘Girl of Qatif’ and the boy who sat with her in the car “should therefore be declared null and voidâ€. Continue reading The Girl of Qatif