Wed 29 Aug 2007
Slam Drunk Fascism:Coming to a Campus Near You
Posted by dvarisco under Gender and Sexuality , Islam in America , Islamophobia , Terrorism Issue
Fascism, a thorn rather than a rose by any other name, has a long and sordid history. The modern term was resurrected from the gore-galore glorified history of ancient Rome by Benito Mussolini in the 1920s to signal the power of the state (his state, of course) über alles (as his ersatz Aryan co-fascist to the north put it). As an ideology it dispensed of a need for any other religion than the twisted Durkheimian notion that the dictatorial “state” was really at stake when talking about “God.” As a fashionable pejorative term to heap abuse on one’s enemies, “fascist” readily becomes the modern day equivalent of saying the hated other is a bloodthirsty cannibal.
Now there is the recent moniker “Islamofascism,” which appears to have been coined by the Marxist French scholar Maxime Rodinson to describe the overthrow of the Shah and unexpected rise of an Islamic Republic in Iran. If so, this demonstrate the malleability of a term in which one form of fascism seemingly replaces another. But then the rhetorical door opens at least a crack for renaming the Vatican a “Christofascist” city state — surely a word game that would make both Mussolini and the popes turn over in their graves.
Confused? Not to worry … because David Horowitz, an idiotologue out to save “Western civilization” along with Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer, has embarked on a cybercrusade campaign to make “you” aware of the apocalyptic dangers of Islamofascism. Forget about global warming (a liberal trick to discredit the Bush administration) and look out for bearded jihadis on the march. Mark your calendars for the week of October 22-26 for the coming of “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” Don’t expect any parades down Main Street (we need to keep up the barriers so the terrorists don’t get us at home), but man the campus barricades and stick it to the Women’s Studies Centers.
Horowitz, whose khutzpah appears to have achieved the lethal testosterone levels of the dogged athlete Michael Vick, has issued his manifesto (not that there is any innuendo of communist leanings in my usage of this overloaded term) called “A Student’s Guide to Hosting
Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.” Here is the rationale:
During the week of October 22-26, 2007, the nation will be rocked by the biggest conservative campus protest ever – Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week, a wake-up call for Americans on 200 university and college campuses.
The purpose of this protest is as simple as it is crucial: to confront the two Big Lies of the political left: that George Bush created the war on terror and that Global Warming is a greater danger to Americans than the terrorist threat. Nothing could be more politically incorrect than to point this out. But nothing could be more important for American students to hear. In the face of the greatest danger Americans have ever confronted, the academic left has mobilized to create sympathy for the enemy and to fight anyone who rallies Americans to defend themselves. According to the academic left, anyone who links Islamic radicalism to the war on terror is an “Islamophobe.” According to the academic left, the Islamo-fascists hate us not because we are tolerant and free, but because we are “oppressors.”
Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week is a national effort to oppose these lies and to rally American students to defend their country.
Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week will feature
• Memorial services for the victims of Islamic Terror both in America and around the globe.
• A Student petition denouncing Islamo-Fascist violence against women, gays, Christians, Jews and non-religious people.
• A Teach-In on “The Oppression of Women in Islam.”
• Sit-ins in Women’s Studies Departments and campus Women’s Centers to protest their silence about the oppression of women in Islam.
• Prominent speakers against Islamo-Fascism such as Ayan Hirsi Ali, Mark Steyn, David Horowitz, Nonie Darwish, Christina Hoff Sommers, Phyllis Chesler, Frank Gaffney and Daniel Pipes.
• Documentary films about the Islamo-Fascist crusade against America, Israel and the West.
• Distribution of materials on Islamo-Fascism including the pamphlets The Oppression of Women in Islam, The Islamic Mein Kampf, Why Israel is the Victim, Jimmy Carter’s War Against the Jews, and What Every American Needs to Know About Jihad.
In the present campus climate, this program is bound be controversial. It will test universities’ claims to be politically open and intellectually diverse. Its goal will be to refute the curriculum of the left, which teaches that America is the enemy in the war on terror and the terrorists are “freedom fighters,” whom progressives should support.
We expect that many universities will create impediments to the planned protests and events, refuse necessary permits or room reservations, and otherwise demonstrate their hypocrisy by failing to allow patriotic students a voice on campus. We hope to be proven wrong, but past experience counsels otherwise. The David Horowitz Freedom Center will enlist lawyers and alumni to help student organizers fight these battles.
If you are looking for a challenge this fall, if you want to break through the barrier of politically-correct doublespeak that prevails on American campuses, if you want to help our brave troops who are fighting the Islamo-Fascists abroad — bring Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week to your campus this October.
As of August 29, 2007 his website lists 111 American colleges and universities where the awaremess (spelling intentional) is supposed to take place. A cursory glance indicates that students from my own university have not yet been inducted into the process. My initial reaction to the website was that Mr. Horowitz was rushing in to fill the void left by the end of the Weekly World News in print edition. But then I did not see Ed Anger listed as one of the suggested experts on the subject, although his qualifications are certainly in keeping with those of the experts listed (and available for a fee) from the Horowitz command center. As someone who survived the campus protests of the late 60s and early 70s and has lived to see the formidable depths of apathy of recent generations of students since the Reagan era, I suspect that most students would rather skip class, get laid, get drunk or any of about a hundred other ipod-friendly options rather than gawk at, let alone participate in, an old-fashioned campus sit-in.
Oh yes, the call for a politically correct sit-in. Here are the instructions in the student guide provided by Horowitz:
To protest the silence of Women’s Studies programs and Women’s Centers in our universities while women are suffering brutal and inhumane treatment in the Islamic world, we recommend holding a “sit-in” at the offices of your campus Women’s Studies Department or Women’s Center.
A sit-in may serve as a prelude to a later film screening or panel discussion that same evening, and can be a means of advertising other events during Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.
Please note: Sit-ins should not obstruct university operations or violate university rules. We encourage you to station yourselves in a public area (directly outside the office of the Women’s Studies Department or the campus Women’s Center for example) and to set a start and end time for the protest.
This is a sit-in? Be nice and orderly, don’t get in the way, set a time to start and end. He forgot to add to bring cushions in case the floor is too hard on the tushy, water bottles if it will be over a half hour, an ipod in case you get bored, your cell phone, a digital camera for taking pictures of anyone who goes in and out of the Women’s Studies Office and looks confused about gender, and of course lots of pamphlets (which will correct the silly ideas in the textbooks chosen by their professors) from Mr. Horowitz’s “Freedom” center.
On further reflection I think that Mr. Horowitz’s proposed campus blitz is good news. Given what I often hear on the news and gather from talk show schlock, I have assumed that Islamophobia was so rampant that it needed no awareness raising. If one of the architects of the cybercrusade against Islam feels the need to have students sit-in in front of Women’s Studies Centers for the sake of liberating Muslim women (will there be future sit-ins for Orthodox Jewish women, Mormon women, Baptist women or perhaps even women in general?), then he must be worried that college students are not buying his hate rhetoric. And if the way to combat terrorism in the name of Islam is to talk about the way they treat their wives and daughters, then we can finally stop taking off our shoes in the airline security lines.
Terrorism exists. Every day hundreds of people are killed in terrible ways worldwide, far too often in the name of religion. The problem however is not fascism of any particular religious or state flavor, but the state-authorized intolerance and oppression that Mussolini and Hitler exemplified. The fascism they championed was in the name of a powerful, all-controlling state. The makeshift (made all the more popular by attempts to treat it as larger than life) and motley crew of frustrated terrorists like Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawaheri are nowhere near the threat posed by fascist (and communist) dictators in the last century. Say what you will about Iran, but it is not a fascist state (certainly no more than when the puppet Shah ruled) and Ahmadenijad is no Stalin.
Islam should no more be reduced to a religion of war against the infidel as it can ideally to a message of peace for all men. Like all religions, especially one with over a billion adherents, Islam is as good or bad as the Muslims who follow it. The vast majority of Muslims reject the life-wrenching violence of terrorists, in part because the victims are usually fellow Muslims. It is a nauseating affront to the several million Muslims living in America to assume that their religion is somehow unsuited for Western “civilization” or that they follow a prophet who espoused hatred or that Islamic teaching oppresses women in a cultural vacuum. Fascism is all about politics and the political is never really about religion.
Fortunately I will be out of the country during the proposed Islamofascism by and for Idiots week of Mr. Horowitz and his imagined student hordes. I will be attending a conference in Amsterdam on issues facing contemporary Muslims and giving a paper on why Western concepts like “Islamism” and “Islamofascism” only fuel misunderstanding and promote more violence.
Oh, by the way, all this is good news for the gay community. If Mr. Horowitz has his way, the big conservative “rock the voter” issue in the coming round will not be about Gay Marriage but Muslim bashing of Gays. God (not to be confused with Allah) bless David Horowitz and Larry Craig; where would we be if hypocrisy and self-delusion didn’t transcend political affiliation?
Daniel Martin Varisco
August 30th, 2007 at 6:08 am
Gay folks are not the only people who are grateful, at least in the UK. As my neighbour Patrick told me in his Belfast brogue, “We’re very grateful to you Muslims for taking the heat off us Irish!”
September 1st, 2007 at 5:13 am
“The problem however is not fascism of any particular religious or state flavor, but the state-authorized intolerance and oppression that Mussolini and Hitler exemplified.”
Huh?
So the “state-authorized intolerance that Mussolini and Hitler exemplified” is not fascism, but Islamo-fascism, which does not exist, is a lot like the Hitler or Mussolini regime?
Your blogger’s brain just exploded and made a mess on the keyboard.
September 1st, 2007 at 5:17 am
Oh I get it. Just go to sleep until later…
“The makeshift (made all the more popular by attempts to treat it as larger than life) and motley crew of frustrated terrorists like Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawaheri are nowhere near the threat posed by fascist (and communist) dictators in the last century.”
Yes, yes, kind of like how the National Socialists of the Beerhall Putsch were just a motley crew of frustrated terrorists, as were the Bolsheviks of the, say 1910-1913 era.
No threat there at all. Nothing to see here, just keep moving.
September 2nd, 2007 at 7:48 pm
I do not understand why you deny the links between German National Socialists and the modern day leaders of the Middle East. I do not understand why you ignore that fascism is very ancient and has the same Latin roots as the word fascinate. Yeah, nothing to see here, just move along… I do not understand why an anthropologist is now a foriegn policy expert too? Maybe he’s a propagandist instead. I do not understand why the left cannot accept its fascist past? Oh ok, maybe that’s why he’s drunk.
September 2nd, 2007 at 9:02 pm
Any other place the following bulleted points would be heralded by liberals as being a cultural necessity AND anyone opposing these points would be labled right-wing fascists:
• Memorial services for the victims of violence both in America and around the globe.
• A student petition denouncing violence against women, gays, and secularists.
• A Teach-In on “The Oppression of Women.”
• Sit-ins at the Women’s Studies Departments and campus Women’s Centers to protest their silence about the oppression of women.
But because the bulleted points add the fact that it is Islamofascism causing the violence and oppressing the women - there is resistance to these on-campus events and ad hominen attacks are being hurled at the organizer and sponsor of the events.
Talk about a double standard.
So what you’re saying Tabsir is that all the Southern Christian fundamentalists have to do - is convert to Islam - then they can beat and oppress as many women as they wish, engage in violence against homosexuals, bomb as many black churches as they want, kill Jews, own as many AK-47’s and RPG’s as they wish and openly segregate their society - because Allah said it’s ok??
September 2nd, 2007 at 11:09 pm
As someone at a university whose students are allegedly planning to participate in this event, I think the problem is that some local campus organizations are being manipulated in the most cynical fashion by Mr. Horowitz and his various front organizations. Terrorism, global warming, and women’s studies programs? These have what to do with one another? Only that Mr. Horowitz, in his most recent fit of paranoia, has latched onto yet another way to construct the phantom of “the Academic Left.” While he claims to be the friend of students, he has no respect for them at all. His communications strategy, as outlined in his 2000 book “The Art of Political War,” is to gabble together arresting images, repeating as necessary, until the masses submit to his slogans. In order to win political battles, according to Horowitz, “You have only thirty seconds to make your point. Even if you had time to develop an argument, the audience you need to reach (the undecided and those in the middle who are not paying much attention) would not get it. Your words would go over some of their heads and the rest would not even hear them (or quickly forget) amidst the bustle and pressure of daily life” (p. 11); “Your task is to define yourself as the friend of as large a constituency as possible compatible with your principles, while defining your opponent as the enemy whenever you can” (p. 11); “When you speak, do not forget that a sound bite is all you have. Whatever you have to say, make sure to say it loud and clear. Keep it simple and keep it short–a slogan is always better. Repeat it often. Put it on television. . . .In politics, television is reality” (p. 15); “Symbols and sound bites determine the vote. These are what hit people in the gut before they have time to think. And these are what people remember. Symbols are the impressions that last, and therefore that ultimately define you. Carefully chosen words and phrases are more important than paragraphs, speeches party platforms and manifestos. What you project through images is what you are” (p. 16).
Mr. Horowitz is a very bright man and a very loud fraud, who has such contempt for the public, including the college students he pretends to champion, that it would be in all our best interests to simply ignore his ravings. Unfortunately, it seems that a pathological fear of being ignored only spurs him on to making ever more noise.
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:07 am
Name calling and false statements do not amount to scholarship.
A scholar would be able to state with some confidence and authority, just what it is that either Spencer or Horowitz state about Islam that is false. You fail that test with a glowing “F” grade.
You’ve been challenged by Spencer to point to ANY error or misinformation in his work and your choose to cower and hide.
You are not “scholars” and how dare you claim to be.
Also, on your “About” page you claim this:
“• We encourage informed debate rather than partisan posturing on all issues.”
Yet you decline a open invitation to debate Spencer. You are no scholar. You are a fraud if you continue to post this statement and refuse to answer the challenge.
Oh please. I quess since this is YOUR blog , it allows you to call yourself an intellectual. Enjoy it. Read it once a day because you will see no one else ascribe that title to you outside these pages.
• We believe in active involvement as public intellectuals communicating the best of available research.
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:53 am
Mr. Varisco,
Does it never give you pause — even for a moment — that you defend a man who was a mass murderer, serial rapist, child molester, torturer, extortionist, oathbreaker, wife beater and common thief? All of Mohammed’s behavior is not only plainly shown, but sacralized, in the Koran and the other holy texts of Islam. And these books teach other people to be murderers, rapists, molesters and thieves.
Does your defense of this man, and the people that follow him in his behavior, not give you pause, not even for a moment? Even Maimonides complained about his Muslim whipmasters; shouldn’t a free man in the West — an intellectual descendant of Jefferson and Washington, not obedient dhimmi serfs — be better than that?
September 3rd, 2007 at 3:50 am
“I will be attending a conference in Amsterdam on issues facing contemporary Muslims…”
Would your obervations include an unwillingness by the vast majority of contemporary Muslims to condemn, ostracize, and reject by name terrorists and terrorist-sympathizers?
September 3rd, 2007 at 4:03 am
I am for free speech, so you are clearly entitled to your opinion about what other people believe and this is an appropriate forum in which to discuss your point of view.
That being said, I question how name calling and angry rants amounts to academic or intellectual opining. Seriously, if a child talked this way, we would put them in Time-Out. If you have proof that Mr. Spencer is lying about his writing or his website, please provide it so we can look at the evidence for your opinion on this matter. If you have no evidence or proof of these men being deceitful, then upon what is your opinion based?
I posted the above link because, while the author may be nearly as angry about this situation as you are, at least he provides references and evidence to support his claims. What do you have?
September 3rd, 2007 at 5:34 am
fascism - a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Fascism
Taliban beat South Korean hostages as punishment for refusing to convert to Islam
ANYANG, South Korea, Sept. 2 (Yonhap) — A pastor at the South Korean church whose volunteers were held hostage for six weeks by Afghanistan’s Taliban said some of the captives were “severely beaten” by the insurgents when they refused to convert to Islam
http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20070902/410100000020070902210154E5.html
The Taliban is deposed, but still maintains control over certain parts of Afghanistan. They captured the missionaries who were working to distribute food and provide aid to the people being afflicted by the war in that region. The two issues that the Taliban have with these missionaries is that they are of a different race and religion. Tell me, does beating someone to get them to become a Muslim qualify as fascist to you?
Ok, answer this, is it Islamic tradition to try to convert people by force? In other words, were the Taliban being good Muslims or bad Muslims when they perpetrated these actions? I am not asking your opinion, what I am asking, is what does the doctrine of their religion teach on this matter? What example does the Qur’an provide when dealing with this? Tolerance? Live and let live? Perhaps, there are some highly acclaimed scriptures that suggest that Islam is tolerant of Christians and Jews, primarily these are taken our of context, meaning that only half of the statement is provided. So I will try to provide the whole statement for your enjoyment?
The Qur’an:
Sura (9:29) - “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Suras 9 and 5 are the last “revelations” that Muhammad handed down.
Sura (9:5) “But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them…” Prayer and charity are among the Five Pillars of Islam, as salat and zakat. See below.
Sura (9:12) - (Continued from above) “But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion” This confirms that Muhammad is speaking of conversion to Islam.
Sura (2:193) - “And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion be only for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.” The key phrase is to fight until “religion be only for Allah.”
So many would say that my comments are hateful, but I am actually only citing the Qur’an, which is the Holy Book of Islam. This is their actual word of God, which must be obeyed. They are therefore instructed by god to force you and I to submit to the idea that there is no illah but Allah and Muhammad is His Prophet. Imagine this, you accuse Robert Spencer of pedaling hate and fascism, when all he has asked for in an honest discussion about what the Qur’an actually says.
This has nothing against the Muslim people, may God bless each and every one of them. This is about the assault on the truth that YOU are waging. You absolutely refuse to acknowledge that there is any truth that the Qur’an and the other traditional manuscripts are imperialistic in nature. Do you realize that in 200 years, nearly the entirety of the Middle East had ceased to be Judeo/Christian and became Muslim? Europeans get blamed for waging the crusades on the Muslims; however the fact of the matter is that Islam was encroaching on Europe. Constantinople was the last vestige of Christdom in the Middle East and they asked for their brothers in Rome to help stop the invading Muslim Armies. The first crusade was about defending the Kingdom, but nobody wants to talk about that fact.
http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2002/cover.htm
You would rather close your ears and your eyes and denounce anyone who disagrees with you despite the evidence that they present. If I am wrong, which I may be, my research was all done online which I freely admit to be a flawed source. If I am wrong, then please present evidence that the sources I site are defective. Does your copy of the Qur’an have a different message than the words I posted here? Please enter a discussion and stop throwing temper tantrums. The truth is more important that your pride. People are dieing over this issue, we need to have an actual discussion about the truth that is written down in their writings and stop the name calling.
September 3rd, 2007 at 12:47 pm
“Tabsir” is a parody website. Isn’t it?
September 3rd, 2007 at 11:37 pm
The only people who still think that terrorism fomented by Middle-eastern Muslim men is a joke or a game are “intellectuals” who have the luxury to cocoon themselves in their own virtual bedlams because others are fighting and dying for this luxury.
Let’s dissect your vomit a little bit further, because as an intellectual, you are used to having your ideas tested, are you not?
You said:
“Confused? Not to worry … because David Horowitz, an idiotologue out to save “Western civilization”….”
Note the scare quotes, which is the cheapest possible way of maligning your opponent without contributing any effort to disproving his ideas. Also note the ad hominems. Congratulations! You’ve mastered the art of rhetoric taught by Mrs. Lynne’s third-grade class!
“…along with Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer, has embarked on a cybercrusade campaign to make “you” aware of the apocalyptic dangers of Islamofascism.”
Note the scare quotes again.
“Forget about global warming (a liberal trick to discredit the Bush administration) and look out for bearded jihadis on the march.”
The rise in sea level temperatures are consistent with the natural warming and cooling of the earth. It takes more faith than I, as a born-again Christian, possess to leap from that to fingering man as the cause for these rises.
Also, surely you’ve heard of the problems associated with the reporting stations? And yet you still advocate global warming as a human-caused activity? Then you are dishonest as well as incorrect.
Finally, the dismissal of bearded jihadis on the march captures your ignorance of terrorism perfectly.
Put your head back in the sand, child. That stinging you feel on your butt is just us taking turns kicking it.
September 5th, 2007 at 3:22 pm
quote from above:
“If Mr. Horowitz has his way, the big conservative “rock the voter” issue in the coming round will not be about Gay Marriage but Muslim bashing of Gays.”
Actually in the Holy Qu’ran the Muslim husband is allowed to beat his wife not the gay. Gays need to be stoned. I am from Saudi Arabia and if you are opposing my Islamic beliefs you are a bigot as far as the truth is concerned. Islam is a religion of peace, it is Christianity and the West that is hateful.
September 5th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Also your countries have a problem with women because you think marrying more than one is wrong. This is silly. There is an excess of women in the world and unless they allow for marriage to more than one woman at the same time you will have prostitues on your hand. Here is the famous dai explaining it better than I can:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=53d_1188521056
September 7th, 2007 at 1:12 am
[…] the call by David Horowitz for an Islamo-fascism Awareness Week in October, posted upon earlier on Tabsir.] Dear friends in WIB, In response to the mail alerting us about this event against ‘islamo […]
September 9th, 2007 at 4:59 pm
[…] other FrontPage’s pundits). One of the blogs that I co-authored ‘entered the lists’ thanks to Varisco’s post. The contention also reached ISLAMAAR, the mailing list of the Islam section of the AAR. During […]
September 12th, 2007 at 10:16 am
[…] other FrontPage’s pundits). One of the blogs that I co-authored ‘entered the lists’ thanks to Varisco’s post. The contention also reached ISLAMAAR, the mailing list of the Islam section of the AAR. During […]
September 15th, 2007 at 11:16 am
[…] reference to “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” (the week of October 22-26, 2007), it is alarmingly odd to hear that there persist to be individuals […]